Saturday, May 19, 2018

Maria Poumier: The Israeli manufacture of artificial Jews: Taking human trafficking to the next level

 

The Israeli manufacture of artificial Jews

Taking human trafficking to the next level

 
 
 
 
[Editor’s note: I just returned from Mashhad, Iran, site of the Jerusalem al-Quds conference. (No hassles at the border this time.) Below is a very interesting paper presented at the conference. Its author, Maria Poumier, is the author of Marchandiser la vie humaine and maker of the documentary The Fruits of Our Womb.–Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor]

The Israeli manufacture of artificial Jews 

Maria Poumier (France) [1]
Paper for the 6th New Horizon International conference, Mashaad, May 2018.
The Zionist entity is number one in biotechnologies, and especially in fabricating artificial kids. Doron Mamet is the one who developed the triangular global trade: extracting human gametes in white countries (mainly Eastern European ones), processing them in Alphaclinic  and Kadimasten labs to give life to embryos, freezing them and breeding them through surrogate women’s wombs in other countries, and selling the babies as soon as they are given birth to wealthy customers all over the world.
The same commercial Jewish schemes were tested with human trafficking and slavery, from Africa to America, to satisfy Europe’s need of cheap workers for conquest and colonization, during 300 years. As proved by Nation of Islam and its great investigation The Secret relationship between Black and Jews Jews (part I: Boston 1993; part II How Jews gained control of the Black economy, and part III, Jews selling Blacks, Slave Sale Advertising by American Jews 2010), Jews played a disproportionate role in the Atlantic Black slave trade, as bankers, traders, shipowners, merchants at auction and owners. We are being told African enslavement was a genuine traditional habit between Africans themselves. But the traffic out of the Black societies was a Portuguese Jewish business. The same happened in the Islamic world earlier, with disproportionately Jewish traders. Jewish doctors in Verdun were the ones who used to castrate slaves in the European Middle Age, including white slavic ones. “Humanitarian” propaganda in the American deportation of more than 30 million Africans spoke about “civilizing” and merciful Christianization. AIPAC sued the Nation of Islam for their research.
The surrogacy business should be brought to international and national courts, because it is a kind of illegal organ trafficking. Women and newborn children are used as commodities, against their own health interests, and the unborn are increasingly recycled in the pharmaceutical research central, as it was discovered in the case of Planned Parenthood Federation, in the US in  2016. The role of Israel in organ theft from Palestinian prisoners has been revealed by Johannes Whalstrom in the Swedish Aftonbled. Some rabbis have been arrested in the US, but nothing happened to them in Israel. The Israeli organ traffic is especially well known concerning Brazil, South Africa, Ukraine and Rumania. As Israel Shamirwrote, “Israel is not the only country suspected of such nefarious activities. Carla del Ponte, chief prosecutor at the Hague tribunal for Balkan crimes, wrote in her 2008 book The Hunt: Me and War Criminals that under the aegis of the Kosovo Liberation Army, this ally of NATO and the US, hundreds of young Serb prisoners were allegedly taken by truck from Kosovo to northern Albania where their organs were removed.” It is time to tell the world that Israel and NATO are also gamete hunters and embryo and baby sellers.
Nowadays the increasing sterilization of most parts of the world, alongside new technologies, have succeeded in creating a global artificial baby market. Israel works hard to multiply the worldwide Jewish population, and propagandizes for sodomites to consider buying children, for use either as slaves or as heirs. Such campaigns destroy family-based morality, erase religious traditions, ruin male and female dignity, destroy respect towards paternal and maternal authority, and impugn children’s dignity. It is the latest toxic invention of imperialism, and it is an Israeli project. The World Jewish Congress congratulated Obama and the Supreme Court for imposing gay marriage legalization all over the US. So did the Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon. Tellingly, the press and the courts fight homophobia as a supposed anti-Semitic threat.
More legalized abortions in every country, entailing the extensive slaughter of human embryos, are required to make such criminal agenda profitable. Westerners are not aware that it is an Israeli business, part of a worldwide plan to diminish, weaken and subjugate the new generations. We can fight successfully against it by showing that it belongs to the tradition of English upper class Malthusianism, entailing a frenetic impetus to oblige the poor not to breed. It is shocking too as a form of nazi style racist eugenics, because it considers most inhabitants or the world as despicable subhuman beings, unworthy to give birth to others.
This criminal plot treats us as cattle to be selected, culled, and softly castrated, so we produce more and resist less. “Fertility” agencies officially offer “Low Cost” and “Prime” children, at different costs from $30,000 to $200,000. Many payers chose a baby born in the US, even if they are the most expensive ones, in order to get US citizenship for them, and be able to transfer assets to the US.
It is a technological tyranny that follows Monsanto’s privatization of seeds, vegetable species and genes. It is a crime against humanity, because it constricts human biological diversity and creates new artificial diseases. It already uses poor women all around the world as mere containers for oocytes and uteruses, endangering their own health. Many scientists are already fighting against the Israeli project of putting our countries under such total reproductive control. The leading Israeli agency Tammuz has already been expelled from several countries including India, Thailand, Nepal, and Cambodia.
What we are not supposed to know 
There has been a recent explosion of medically treated infertility throughout the world. Since 1950, men’s fertility has fallen to one half of what it was before, and the quality of sperm is dramatically declining in the most developed countries. As a matter of fact, the same dramatic change is occurring in the whole animal kingdom, and it helps to explain the advances of homosexuality, uneasiness with one’s gender, and bi and transsexual behaviour.  The flourishing LGBTQ lobby has come about not only  as a result of our openness to individual freedom and the widening acceptance of diversity, but as a symptom of disturbances at the biological level, undermining the  moral and mental stability of new generations of people. It reveals a serious (if denied) collective disease, probably caused by complexities of environmental contamination. It seems that nothing will stop the decay of natural human fertility. Neither Western governments nor international health institutions are warning us of the dramatic changes coming. They are only interested in developing the business of artificial reproduction, a convenient way to have more control of the population, in the service of a dictatorial, Malthusian and unapologetically eugenic ideology.
Women’s infertility is actually increasing too, not least because many Westerners avoid giving birth until their 30’s or 40’s, when it becomes difficult, especially after frequent abortions and transmissible sexual infections. The experiments for in vitro fertilisation (IVF) started with animals under Dr Shrenk in Vienna in the 1880s. Dr. Gregory Pincus developed it, with Dr. Enzmann in Harvard and Saunders and Myriam Menkin, until the first test-tube baby Louise Brown was born in England in 1978, thanks to the work of Robert Edwards, who went on to win a Nobel prize for his efforts. Immediately, the Pope warned that it could lead to the use of women as baby factories. An unknown number of Jewish doctors have inseminated their patients with their own sperm; the case of Dr. Bertold Wiener who produced some 600 un-recognized children is not the only one. [2]
The Israeli industry of human reproduction
It is not surprising that when it comes to the industrial reproduction business, Israel is the leading country. No official statistics are available but it seems that the Israeli infertility rate is the highest in the world; 1 in 4 couples ask for fertility treatment, while 1 in 6 or 7 in other developed countries do. One explanation is that endogamy through many Jewish generations leads to the multiplication of genetic diseases.
In Israel, abortion for so-called medical reasons, after prenatal and prenuptial tests, is widely practiced, at the rate of 17% of pregnancies ending in deliberate abortions[3]. Israel provides free medical care relating to the fertility for Israeli citizens, and at very low prices for Jews from other countries. Fees are lower than in the US, but higher than in the Czech Republic, the most liberal and cheap European country for such treatment. Not only is sperm needed, but  human egg donation is required too, and the egg collection industry is very big business especially when the eggs come from young white, blond and blue eyed girls, almost for free, in Eastern Europe. Here is a recent Haaretz account :
« In 2000, police investigated claims that certain Israeli doctors were over-stimulating the ovaries of patients to induce over-production of eggs, which they then sold without permission. One doctor was suspended, another reprimanded. Israeli doctors have also been associated with scandals overseas: in 2009 and 2013 Romania charged Israeli doctors, in two separate incidences, of exceeding the boundaries of their local operating permits and illegally trading in human eggs, harvesting them without permits from Romanian women for sale to other women, including Israelis. Both times, doctors denied any wrongdoing. »[4]
With frozen eggs from all over Eastern Europe (extracted in Israeli clinics in Cyprus) and frozen sperm, frozen embryos are cooked up in Israel (Alphaclinic, Kadimasten). Afterwards, they are exported to research centres in developed countries, and for surrogacy in the  poorest ones.
Israeli laws
This reproductive business is not limited by law. In Israel, any private business is essentially free, only the global market rules, and Israeli citizens are proud of the freedom enjoyed by their industry and trade, as much as for their scientific leadership; Israeli bio-tech is probably the most developed in the whole world, since the first medical fertility experiments and interventions on human beings were allowed more than in any other country. In 1996, surrogacy was legalized too, earlier than in any other country. And since 2014, surrogacy for gay couples or singles has been legal (although religious deputies and courts don’t agree, and try to reserve the rent of wombs only for Jewish women). Any Israeli citizen coming with a newborn baby can declare him as his son and as a new Israeli citizen, without inquiry concerning who gave sperm, who gave eggs, who got pregnant, who delivered the human being to an Israeli citizen, in some far away country. The whole medical process for a couple’s fertility is paid by the State.
Now, as a result, the birth rate in Israel is much higher than in any other developed country. Three reasons sum up the ultra-natalist Israeli politics:
– Officially, Israel wants to compensate for Holocaust losses of the population, and the virtual losses of the sons and grandsons of European Jewish victims.
– Officially, Israel wants to compensate for losses caused by Palestinian Intifadas and lethal attacks.
– As a State, Israel has been in danger while surrounded by prolific Arab families.
The Zionist miracle and its secret
A few years ago, as surrogacy business was spreading all around the world, the Israeli media were saying a «miracle» is happening:
«Just as remarkable is that fertility in most of the Muslim world has fallen below Israel’s, while the fertility of Israeli Arabs and Arabs in Judea and Samaria has converged on the Jewish fertility rate in Israel [in Gaza too]. At present there is no risk that a non-Jewish majority will emerge between the Mediterranean and the Jordan River. Not only has the so-called population time bomb disappeared in Israel; in large parts of the Muslim world, fertility has fallen below the Jewish fertility rate in Israel. … [Lebanon : 1,5 children per woman]… While Israel’s ultra-Orthodox minority [8% of the Israeli population] contributes disproportionately to Jewish population growth, most of the increase in Jewish births comes from the secular and non-Orthodox religious categories, which average 2.6 children per woman. Faitelson notes that the ultra-Orthodox fertility rate fell over the past decade, while the fertility of the general Jewish population rose. »[5] In the next 50 years, the Israeli population will be much younger, and probably more dynamic than in any Western country.
The extensive domestic surrogacy business helps to explain this « miracle », and naturally, it has its exportation department. The secret of Israel’s success has been disclosed:
“Welcome to Tammuz : Ever since it’s establishment by Doron Mamet in 2008, “Tammuz” has been at the forefront of the surrogacy revolution in order to allow fertility and surrogacy procedures for all by offering professional yet affordable surrogacy programs in U.S.A, Israel, India, Thailand, Nepal and Mexico”. “Currently Tammuz is offering surrogacy plans in the USA (for heterosexuals/gays/couples and individuals) and in Ukraine (for heterosexual couples only).
Over the years, Tammuz initiated different surrogacy programs and offered special procedures as a “one stop shop” agency by combining egg donations, IVF treatments and surrogacy”.
Now, in 2018, the campaigns for abolition of surrogacy all around the world have made things more complicated. Both feminists and orthodox Jews interfere, the former (Yael Asheloni Dolev, Einat Ramon, Ish I Isa) in the defence of women’s dignity and the latter against homosexuality.
Let us go back to the Israeli advertising:
“In 2011 Doron Mamet was chosen as one of the 50 most influential LGBT in Israel by Mako Pride website. In 2013 he was chosen as one of the leading pioneers in the world in the book “Überpreneur- 36 People You Must Meet”, among leading figures line Oprah Winfrey and Mark Zuckerberg. [6]»
The leading Tammuz Corporation produced the film Google Babies in 2009, in order to promote its records in this triangular human trade. You can watch it for free on YouTube with French subtitles.[7] It was shown just once by ARTE Channel, but it shocked people in Europe; here is the storyline:
Google Baby is a journey across three continents telling the story of the up and coming baby production industry in the age of globalization. Doron, an Israeli entrepreneur with a high tech background proposes a new service – Baby production. The baby producer (as he introduces himself) provides customers with a cost effective solution using outsourcing of the surrogacy element to [poor countries] as way to lower prices. The preferred genetic material is selected by the clients and the rest is left in the hands of the producer: Sperm and eggs are purchased on-line and multiple embryos are produced and frozen. Packed in liquid nitrogen only the embryos that fit the customers preferences are shipped by air [to Far East] – where they are implanted into the wombs of local surrogates. The customers arrive only at the end of the nine month pregnancy period to pick up their babies. Today, technology has turned ‘making a baby’ into an act independent of sex. And globalization is making it affordable”.
The real number of ‘artificial’ babies delivered by surrogates is not available. But Doron Mamet is mentioned in Andrews and Wood’s Uberpreneurs in the same category as the most important inventors of the new global business, in the aim of «happiness for all». He only confesses to a few thousand «products». No businessman could access Uberpreneurs ranking with such minor achievements.
Uberpreneurs mentions as a hero one Gilad Japhet, creator or MyHeritage, a successful genealogist dedicated at first to finding Jewish roots and genes all over the world. Now he makes a lot of money doing genealogical research for anyone; and one of his  special aims is to enable his clients to find Jewish gametes all over the world, not genetically too close, but still kosher, available for artificial fecundation and reproduction. His slogan is «Identify and Indemnify (p. 197-200)». So here is the Israeli goal : produce synthetic Jews by any means, in order to be strong in claiming compensation for the Holocaust, for the Inquisition, for everything since Pharaoh, or more, if possible. Be fruitful and multiply, says the Bible. Never forget, never forgive, say Jewish lawyers lobbying for compensations from the Holocaust industry ; never stop inventing new ways for selling human flesh and buying the human spirit, suggestive of the vivid ghost of the Merchant of Venice. As Yves Tiberghien writes : « By focusing on the trajectories of some of the most extraordinary entrepreneurs of our time, Andrews and Wood remind us of the immense transformative power of individuals relative to governments and other institutions »[11]. He means that global reach of business can break any national barrier in matters of civil law, as well as any religious barriers about morals, common sense, and normal universal feelings.

[1] Maria Poumier is author of Marchandiser la vie humaine, 340 p., 2016, Le Retour aux Sources, Paris, France ; in 2015 she realized a documentary The Fruits of Our Womb, 60’ with English subtitles https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LkPW0j4cbSY
[2] In the 1940’s, one Austrian Jew living in Great Britain earned a great deal of money by becoming a «serial father». Dr. Bertold Weisner was a biologist, and a pioneer of human artificial insemination. He successfully inseminated a lot of wealthy ladies, at a very high cost to them. His wife, Mary Bartons, was the owner of their fertility clinic. On Wikipedia, his biography is presented glowingly. But in the 1970’s, one of his more than 600, maybe 1,000 children found evidence that he produced all of them with his own sperm. It is said that he and his wife destroyed their archives. As a matter of fact, one of his sons, created in such a deceptive manner, is now an activist against sperm donation. See Wikipedia : “In 2007, Wiesner’s natural son Jonathan Wiesner provided saliva and blood from which his DNA was isolated and held on record. Since then, a number of people have been able to verify that Bertold Paul Wiesner is their biological father through a DNA match to Jonathan Wiesner. Wiesner’s biological offspring, conceived by artificial insemination performed by Mary Barton and confirmed by DNA testing, include author and psychotherapist Paul NewhamBarrister David Gollancz, and film maker Barry Stevens, whose documentary films were instrumental in facilitating and publicizing the process by which Wiesner’s offspring can confirm their paternity” .
See also :  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2130814/The-man-fathered-1-000-children-Theyre-middle-class-living-Britain–idea-extraordinary-story-surrounding-birth.html[1]. It seems that there have been other leading scientists prepared to  play the same rather unChristian game. And pride about their supposed hereditary cleverness can silence the trapped families.
[3] Yael Hashiloni Dolev, A Life (Un)worthy of living, Reproductive Genetics in Israel and Germany, Springer 2006
[6] Uberpreneurs, How to Create Innovative Global Business and Transform Human Societies, par Peter Andrews et Fiona Wood, palgrave macmillan, 2014.
[8]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodification_of_the_womb; also see Spar, Debora. “For love and money: the political economy of commercial surrogacy,” Review of International Political Economy 12 (2005): 287-309.
[11] Read more: 10 reasons to chose Israeli Fertility Care, http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/culture/health/1.631674

Friday, May 18, 2018

“Jerusalem al-Quds: Eternal Capital of Palestine” Conference in Mashhad, Iran





L to R: Alexander Dugin, Arash Darya-Bandari, Reza Montazami, Scott Bennett, Philip Giraldi
Mashhad, Iran
6:00 pm, Al-Ghadir Hotel lobby
The post-conference wrap-up session for the 6th New Horizons Conference just finished an hour ago. Its theme “Jerusalem al-Quds: Eternal Capital of Palestine” was painfully timely, since Trump chose this week to move the US Embassy to Occupied Jerusalem al-Quds and tear up the Iran nuclear deal in acts of obsequious fealty to Netanyahu. Meanwhile, Israeli sharpshooters mowed down thousands of unarmed Palestinians with live gunfire and exploding bullets. Being here in Mashhad for this event was an act of protest against such insane barbarity—as I will tell the DHS interrogators when I arrive home in the United States.
This year’s conference was the first to include former US military, intelligence, and diplomatic people, including my Veterans Today colleague Jim Dean, former CIA officer Philip Giraldi,  US Army psy-ops whistleblower Scott Bennett, and ex-State Department whistleblower Michael Springmann. It also included a born-in-Israel guest, Miko Peled, son of the Israeli 1967 war hero general Matti Peled.
In the past, people with US government backgrounds and Israelis were off limits due to the Iranian government frowning on issuing visas for such people. I argued strenuously for including them, and am very happy to see the Iranian decision-makers choosing to do so.
Below is the final statement I read aloud at the conclusion of the Conference.

6th International New Horizons Conference Summary

By Kevin Barrett, Muslim-Christian-Jewish Alliance for Truth (MUJCA.org) and TruthJihad.com
New Horizons Conferences, held fairly regularly in Iran, bring together dozens of the world’s most provocative thinkers and activists.  I have attended five of the six New Horizons Conferences and can unequivocally affirm that they are the most interesting intellectual get-togethers I have ever experienced.
Attendees represent a considerable portion of our planet’s national, ethnic, linguistic, and religious diversity. They also represent wildly diverse projects and ideologies. But I believe all participants agree on two things: We support the transition from a unipolar world system to a multipolar one; and we support the liberation of Palestine.
This year’s conference coincides with Trump’s moving the US Embassy to Occupied Jersualem. Trump’s move symbolically supports the Zionist claim to Jerusalem—a claim that grossly violates international law, basic justice, and simple common sense. The notion that tribalist fanatics purporting to represent fewer than 20 million Jews (most of whom are not especially religious) should invade, occupy, ethnically cleanse, and assert sole ownership of a land that is holy to roughly four billion people, virtually all of them Christians and Muslims, is an absurdity and an abomination. There is only one possible response to such a ludicrous and criminal project: This will not stand!
Participants in the New Horizons Conferences have come to their shared anti-Zionist position from a wide variety of starting points. Some, especially those of us who were educated in the West, began as true-believing adherents of the religion of secular humanism, which holds the human being and his or her individual aspirations (life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness) as the one thing that is truly sacred. Corollaries of this secular humanist religion, which is the dominant creed of Western elites, include an individualist conception of human rights; special protected status to “oppressed minorities” that include majorities (women) and economically privileged groups (Jews, homosexuals); belief in never-ending “progress”; sacred and unquestionable narratives of mass human sacrifice events  (the Holocaust, 9/11); a materialist rather than spiritualist worldview; and a patronizing dismissal of traditional religion.
The secular humanist religion of Western elites is rarely recognized as a religion by its adherents, in the same way that fish are rarely aware of water. It is only when the fish leaves water that it becomes aware of what it used to be swimming in. Likewise, when those of us formed in an orthodox Western milieu come to New Horizons conferences in Iran, we often experience intellectual culture shock when we encounter the worldviews of those who have left Western elite orthodoxy even further behind than we ourselves have. And although we may in fact have good reasons for disagreeing with some of the unorthodox perspectives we encounter in Iran, we should also remain humble enough to recognize that we may have something to learn from them. In that spirit of the eternal quest for truth through questioning and humility I wish all of you a pleasant and productive return home. May God bless and protect you and help us all work together for a better world.



Veterans Today Editor Jim Dean looks pretty sharp in a keffiyeh -but what is he saying in Farsi?
 
Alexander Dugin, one of the world’s most influential intellectuals
 
Rabbi Dovid Weiss, the world’s best-known anti-Zionist Jewish leader, is a regular at New Horizons conferences




US Army psy-ops whistleblower Scott Bennett
 
Alison Weir, author of Against Our Better Judgment
 
Miko Peled, author of The General’s Son, engaged in lively discussion
 
Noted Catholic intellectual E. Michael Jones moonlighting as art critic
 
NYC Congressional candidate Sander Hicks sings out for Palestine
 
Ex-CIA officer Philip Giraldi tells the hard truths about Zionism—and its horrific effects on America
 
Renowned international journalist Pepe Escobar contemplates Paint for Palestine


Kevin Barrett
Dr. Kevin Barrett, a Ph.D. Arabist-Islamologist, is one of America’s best-known critics of the War on Terror.
He is host of TRUTH JIHAD RADIO; a hard driving weekly radio show funded by listener donations at Patreon.com and FALSE FLAG WEEKLY NEWS (FFWN); a audio-video show produced by Tony Hall, Allan Reese, and Kevin himself. FFWN is funded through FundRazr.
He also has appeared many times on Fox, CNN, PBS and other broadcast outlets, and has inspired feature stories and op-eds in the New York Times, the Christian Science Monitor, the Chicago Tribune, and other leading publications.
Dr. Barrett has taught at colleges and universities in San Francisco, Paris, and Wisconsin; where he ran for Congress in 2008. He currently works as a nonprofit organizer, author, and talk radio host.

Jack Mullen, Trump: There is No Such Thing as "A Gun-Free Zone"


      Author's note - On Thursday January 26, Donald Trump was speaking in Philadelphia at a meeting of Republican lawmakers and he noted violent crime rates in some of the major American cities are out of control. In particular Donald singled out Chicago, saying "What the Hell is happening in Chicago?"

      Well Donald I can tell you the difference between say Chicago and its crime rate and cities like Houston, Salt Lake City or Oklahoma City, is the right to keep and bear arms.

      These cities and many others are helping America experience a large downturn in violent crime which has gone down every year since 1994, reaching 1978 levels in 2014, according to the FBI. These cities allow some form of concealed carry by permit or Constitutional carry, in accordance with the Supreme Law of the land.

      It is to the politically created reality which touts the benefits of disarming the citizen to order reduce crime that I speak to now, because, as you know and all men of reason know, There is No Such Thing as a Gun Free Zone.
Gun-free zones are a magnet for those who want to kill many people quickly. Even the most ardent gun control advocate would never put “Gun-Free Zone” signs on their home. Let’s stop finally putting them elsewhere. - John Lott Jr.
Theorem: There are NO GUN FREE ZONES
    "Gun Free Zones" are bounded regions where law abiding people are not allowed to be armed - formally being disarmed before entering.  Gun Free Zones in Public Spaces (GFZPS) are a violation of the Constitution for the United States, violate many State Constitutions, and, more importantly, violate Natural Law. 

The fundamental law is the foundation of our society.  In the United States of America, it is the U.S. Constitution.  Through this document, our fundamental rights are secured and protected against infringement by the federal government and by the State governments, because the States are also parties to this contract. - Paul Andrew Mitchell, “The Federal Zone”

No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it. [16 Am. Jur. 2d, Section 177; later 2d, Section 256]
The state of Nature has a law of Nature to govern it, which obliges every one, and reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind who will but consult it, that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty or possessions.  The natural liberty of man is to be free from any superior power on earth, and not to be under the will or legislative authority of man, but to have only the law of Nature for his rule.  John Locke

    Gun Free Zones in Public Spaces are dangerous and, like cancer, can become a pathological process spreading ever widening areas, including cities, parks, government occupied buildings and properties. It can further metastasize over whole public regions including counties and States.

    COMPETITION FOR PEACE AND SECURITY

Competition is a sin, therefore you must destroy it. John D. Rockefeller
The theory of natural monopoly is an economic fiction. No such thing as a ―natural monopoly has ever existed. The history of the so-called public utility concept is that the late 19th and early 20th-century ―utilities competed vigorously, and like all other industries, they did not like competition. They first secured government-sanctioned monopolies, and then, with the help of a few influential economists, they constructed an ex post facto rationalization for their monopoly power. . . . The theory of natural monopoly is a 19th-century economic fiction that defends 19th-century (or 18th-century, in the case of the U.S. Postal Service) monopolistic privileges and has no useful place in the 21st-century American economy. - June 14, 1995 at the CATO Institute conference examining the question Postal Service in the 21st Century: Time to Privatize? DiLorenzo, Thomas J.

    It is an axiom: competition for solutions in the markets of human action produce outcomes maximizing the values which support mankind's life and happiness.
    Competitive forces maximize truth and transparency, while actively and invisibly minimizing deception, fraud and dissimulative activities which drain and dissipate the resources originally available for the problems.
    Values necessary for human survival include Peace and Security, without out either, mankind cannot evolve as a community and in the long term he cannot exist.
    Gun Free Zones reduce competition for peace and security. Proceeding with an analogy from economics, GFZPS have the same effect as cartel created monopolies, unnatural and forcibly defended barriers against competitors deliberately erected around lucrative high demand products such as medical drugs (legal) and recreational drugs (illegal), and services, such as the provision of security via police forces and law enforcement.

Unable to maintain their government-granted monopoly, the powerful railroad interests turned to government to do the regulating and price-fixing which they were unable to do themselves. In fact, the pressure that induced Congress to enact the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887 did not come from reformers bemoaning abuses by the powerful railroad interests; it came from the railroad interests themselves, asking Congress to shield them against the harsh winds of competition. - THE BUSINESS END OF GOVERNMENT (1973). Dan Smoot

    Forcibly defended monopolies mean the only people and groups allowed to provide and profit from the monopolized products, or services, are cartel members (corporate or criminal gangs) or Government created gangs (police forces.) In the case of gun free zones, the only people carrying weapons (illegally) are criminals. Criminals of course are not bound by the laws of a monopoly because all observance of law is a voluntary decision and criminals do not, by definition, voluntarily observe the law.
    THE IDEA OF A GUN FREE ZONE IS MAGICAL THINKING: MANY PEOPLE ARE ARMED IN GUN FREE ZONES

    In a monopoly controlled Gun Free Zone, there still exists a market for peace and security, but market forces are nullified creating a vacuum of competing solutions which would provide life maximizing results. In this situation, cartel members and criminals are given exclusive control of peace and security and yet neither group has any personal concern or investment for return in those values. Legally armed cartel members are concerned with law abiding people remaining disarmed and criminals are also concerned with law abiding people remaining disarmed, however for the different reason of increasing their chances of committing lowered risk further crime.  This is common sense and is consistent with natural law.

    Natural Law can be discovered and even understood and it can only be violated at some cost. In the case of an individual's ability to maximize his peace and security, Natural Law is clear, the Individual must be fully self-responsible, ie., he or she must be a competing market provider of peace and security, primarily focusing on preserving protecting their own.

Competition, properly so-called, rests on the activity of separate, independent individuals owning and exchanging private property in the pursuit of their self-interest. It arises when two or more such individuals become rivals for the same trade. - Ayn Rand

    However as an individual provides for his own peace and security and brings his solution to the market, others will too, and must, bring their solutions thereby maximizing the number of competitive solutions providing peace and security. As the number of armed people increases, the incidence of violence and crime, inversely, is reduced. In an invisible way, crime and anti-life activity is minimized for all as the number of competing solutions for peace and security increase.

    COMPETITIVE MARKET IN WEAPONS

    In the case of weapons it’s also axiomatic that to support the Natural Law of competing solutions maximizing peace and security, there must be a competitive market of weapons available to competitors. It would be an unnatural (monopolized) market if only criminals and cartel members could be armed with the most powerful or technologically superior weapons. Again, criminals and unbalancing agents of the enforced monopoly would have a competitive edge in this market and peace and security would again be reduced if there were not competitive weapons available to everyone in the market.

    Thus it is important to recognize: calls for reducing or eliminating your access to the best possible weapons technology of the day, are really deceptive calls to unbalance the market for peace and security and place you at a disadvantage in terms of maximizing your peace and security.

    Gun Bans and Restrictions on Weapons Are Market Destabilizing

    Cartels and monopolies of force are often created as a result of criminal elements having eliminated or usurped third party representatives formerly considered to be functioning to increase your peace and security.

    The Constitution of the United States, acting as a clarifier and preserver of Natural Law, explicated the Natural Law of Self Defense. The Constitution did not make the Law, but was created to provide a legal framework wherein the government established by the document would have enumerated restrictions on how the government could legally act.

    It's clear that for a period of some years, the Constitution was a sufficient reminder and the court systems a sufficient deterrent against acting outside or in a manner inconsistent with Natural Law and the Laws restricting government action as codified in the Constitution.

    But consistent with our understanding of how deception, fraud and unbalancing of coercion free markets is necessary for criminals, and those seeking enrichment not via successful and productive efforts but rather by enslaving or stealing from others, we can directly correlate the creation of monopolies in all profitable markets required by man with a violation of Natural Law (with costs distributed to all not benefitting from the monopoly) and hence violations of the Constitution for the United States.

    The Constitution has now become powerless and no longer limits government action, but has been interpreted to limit the action of market actors; the market being all areas where men and women could and should rightly participate in commerce without coercive limitations on action.

    One such area is in the market for peace and security. Criminals, now actually parties with legal rights or cartel rights inside the created monopolies, are restricting free and open competition for maximizing the values of peace and security.

    It’s totally clear and fully transparent, gun free zones, proliferating in ever widening circles of enforcement, are spaces being made safe and for criminal activity, keeping in mind, criminals do not voluntarily recognize the legal restrictions of gun free zones.
    Arming the people has the effect of creating competition in economic markets - With more and more people armed the competition for peace provides MAXIMUM PEACE. 

    And by way of economic principles, it is not the actual competition (outwardly carrying guns) that reduces violence, but rather it is the threat of competition (possible concealed weapons on everyone) -- the threat of people everywhere competitively armed - that reduces the violence and cost.. It is common sense and natural law.
    We are now witnessing the government acting in a manner that is consistent with favoring criminals, unbalancing the market and institutionalizing violence and predation.

    STATE SPONSORED TERRORISM

    History records time and time again, institutions organizing, at first in service or as representatives for individuals acting in a way supposedly beneficial to individuals. This usually starts out as a system of providing quasi-market solutions for problems individuals find troublesome or uncomfortable creating solutions.

    However, over time, criminal elements, psychopaths and their sycophants will begin to infiltrate and then escalate the number of services provided. Slowly at first, market solutions for many common problems are eliminated as government offers solutions sold as better than competitive services can provide.

People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices. - Adam Smith

    This process easily continues as people, especially European people , (read about white Pathological Altruism), are very trusting and readily handover responsibilities and tasks they find troublesome, labor intensive, or otherwise not pleasurable.

    Over time these governments, Monarchies, or any system of controlling people begin to use fear, intimidation and the invention of problems for which   they can provide monopoly solutions. Costly solutions that ultimately reduce peace and security as their veiled goal is really predation on those unbalanced toward a weaker position in the market place of human action.

    But though the law cannot hinder people of the same trade from sometimes assembling together, it ought to do nothing to facilitate such assemblies; much less to render them necessary. Adam Smith

    State Sponsored Terrorism is a natural and typical act of a fully evolving criminal, mentally ill, control system which attempts to surround populations in monopolies of force, eventually creating total gun free zones inside their nations, while terrorizing the people into giving up their competitive positions and, as criminals, preying on the unprotected individuals across all perceived dimensions of wealth and value.

    These governments and their masters know peace and security are increased by individual competitors, using the most competitive weapons technology available, freely offering (un-coerced) competitive solutions in the marketplace.

    Therefore, the only logical conclusion to be drawn is, the Government intends to do violent crimes against the people and naturally must reduce the number of firearms in the hands of the people to accomplish this goal.

    State Sponsored Terrorism is nothing more than marketing, albeit ruthless, often bloody, and always immoral, by a control system in support of a monopoly in the market of solutions and services offering peace and security

    Governments, collectivized gangs and pockets of mentally ill crime syndicates must still compete in the social and economic market place of human action in order to gain market share and market control. This is a fact most don't understand, much or all of the evil and injustice done by one group to another is done with permission, either overtly or covertly via tacit acceptance of the products, services and contracts of an illicit defacto control system.

    It’s not until, an organization within a market obtains a corner on the market that they can evolved into a fully coercive tyranny, closing the doors to any competition and then gouging takes places in areas of important services. This explains why the Obama Regime must continuously create false flag shootings in order to gain American's permission to begin the process of disarming. After a certain number of people provide support for the idea, the monopoly will have enough power to force its barriers around all peoples: Time is short.

    Gun Free Zones are the safe spaces where State sponsored terrorism can exist mostly unimpeded.

    Gun Free Zones are action zones, State actors and criminal actors artificially causing market unbalancing legal restrictions on people's ability to protect themselves.  In the end, as all people are disarmed, the worst personality traits begin to monopolize the positions of authority in the control system until, a mentally ill monopoly of force begins its most egregious acts of terrorism, theft, rape and mass murder. This has been explored as the concept of Pathocracy wherein, organizations begin to populate with similar minded, mentally ill or psychopathic personality traits.

    Communism is such a political system and, over its nearly 200 years of implementation, every expression of this malignant political system has exhibited mentally ill and psychopathic behaviors leaving misery and wealth destruction as its legacy.

    When a government or system of control begins to demand it provide solutions for peace and security, not voluntarily, and when concomitantly, peace and security are reduced with violent and escalating attacks on people and property (and always "advertised" via a public media circus) you must immediately recognize the danger; the control system is marketing a mentally ill system of control.

    At this moment in time we have an emergency situation.  The acts of Terrorism against the people, ie., Oklahoma City bombing, 9-11, mass shootings like the Batman Movie Theatre shootings, with James Holmes or the Safeway Shooting with Jared Loughner, or the TOTALLY FAKED attacks like the Sandy Hook School Shooting and likely the Boston Bombing, and attacks which may have been faked like those recently in Paris and San Bernardino, **are only the beginning**. Because when the people can no longer provide for their own defense, then anything and everything will be done to them -- history has shown.
    ARGUMENTS FOR IRRATIONAL ACTORS

    Many argue mass shooters are mentally ill and emotionally charged. Claiming such states of mind preclude rational thinking regarding the location of mass shooting. The Batman Shooter, James Holmes for example never mentioned in his notes or other clues the theatre's 'Gun Free Zone" policy had anything to do with his choice of venue for his "mass shooting".

    However, if one actually believes the Holmes shooting was not either encouraged, provocateured, engineered or otherwise influenced by State actors working toward an agenda of total disarmament of the American people, one has to realize by unintentionally choosing a "Gun Free Zone" Holmes was elevating his chances of not being shot while committing his crime. Further the death toll was statistically likely to be higher as a result of the "Gun Free Zone" location.

    It was also claimed in a 2002 study right to carry laws have no effect on the location of a mass shooting (This study does not include recent data, refuting this claim.) But again, it is not the location a "right to carry" law should affect, it's the elimination of a threat or shooting in progress that a Natural Law right to defend your life most certainly will affect.

    Most Americans cannot wrap their head around the fact that most of the recent escalation of mass shootings is in some way influenced by the control system which is attempting to disarm Americans.

    NATURAL LAW SOLUTIONS FOR REDUCING GUN AND OTHER VIOLENT CRIME

    If the government actually cared about insuring the least number of causalities were caused by mass a shooting situation (or other violent crime), then it would have no choice but to recommend the Swiss system of arming and training all people to defend themselves.

    Gun and weapons training could again be part of the education system and begin early in a child's life resulting in self-assured less fearful people aware of the fact that a virtual police officer was everywhere - all the time - in the form of citizens equally armed and trained to respond.

    Training people at a young age to use, respect and understand the importance and position, in a self-dependent individual's life tool complement, is the most responsible, rational and mature way to ensure self-defense is a basic component of healthy state of mind and part of creating, from birth, healthy and self-dependent personality traits.
    This system naturally reduces violent crimes, rapes, robberies, while minimizing damage due to mentally ill shooters who are not motivated to save their own lives in first place.

    Creating a state of dependency in which others are to stand up for your life and to be available in your instantaneous moment of need is childish thinking; the magical thinking of an undeveloped state of consciousness. This is a condition deliberated created by those planning to exploit this vulnerability; public education is culpable and complicit in the devolution of adult states of mind.

    Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Benjamin Franklin

    Clearly Natural Law requires adult people take responsibility for their own lives, otherwise third parties, who are under no obligation to risk their lives for yours, will convince you to transfer your self-responsibility to them in exchange for protection. Transferring self-responsibility to another makes you a ward, a slave, beholden to another for your physical safety and, by induction, anything similar to safety, eventually transferring responsibility for whole classes of actions you are no longer rightfully allowed to take. 

    SILLY ARGUMENTS THAT GUNS IN HANDS OF THE PEOPLE DO NOT STOP TYRANNY

    Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives. James Madison

    There are many that argue (supporting their oppressors) guns in the hands of militias and the people could not have stopped the absolute torturous blood bath of the mentally ill Bolsheviks set loose on Russia by the European and American Jewry and other genocides prosecuted against defenseless peoples.

    In the myopic article called Militia Myths the author makes the claim: A historical analysis reveals that Militias are typically the gateway to tyranny, not the safeguard against it. A heavily armed population has little to no bearing on preventing tyranny. and then gives examples of nations using a militia to throw off foreign aggressors only to create some new form of dictatorship afterwards. He cites examples of the liberating militias degenerating into tyrannies in countries like Vietnam, Afghanistan, Cuba, Somalia, Iraq, and southern Lebanon.  The rest of the article makes similar claims about Bolshevik Russia and other nations where blood baths resulted when unarmed and untrained peoples fell victims to violent psychopaths.

    The article referenced above is written by a person with absolutely no understanding, or apparent education regarding the psychologies and personality types of nations, races and cultures. Nations structured around forms of social hierarchy, having no long standing, historical and institutionalize protection of values, such as property rights, contract law, Individualism, Natural Law and other mainly Western values, as codified in common law principals, cannot be expected to create new governments or ruling bodies based on those values. Western culture (European white cultures) have for hundreds of years had an enlightened system of law and justice based on the Natural Law ideas of

1)   Do all you have agreed to do – which is the basis of contract law;
2)   Do not encroach on other persons and their property – which is the basis of criminal and tort law. Richard Maybury

    Additionally, nations and their peoples with NO HISTORY of identifying and enshrining moral philosophical values preserving individual rights OR isolating governments from assimilating a religious dogma as part of its system of law, cannot expect some liberating internal militia to afterward "promote a Free State". Again, this is childish or magical thinking, resulting in the formation of conclusions which are harmful to rational thought regarding maintaining peace and security and minimizing despotism, tyranny and mentally ill systems of control.

    The cultures and governments of the East and, in fact, isolated and heavily influenced by Eastern immigrants, Czarist Russia, did not or do not possess a law based on Scientific Law, or Natural Law, but rather on Political law. As Richard Maybury aptly points out:

    POLITICAL LAW IS BASED ON POLITICAL POWER. It has no requirement for logic or morality. It changes whenever the political wind changes. Fickle and tangled, no one can completely understand it…. You do whatever the power-holders say, or else. Right or wrong.

    This type of social structure will not allow or promote a system enabling individuals to grow and advance with an understanding of their right to self-defense and protection of their own property.  To expect a "Free State to just manifest after an untrained, either morally or philosophically, militia or organization of peoples with guns, throw off a given tyranny is just plain silly.

    But in fact, Americans, mostly educated (as the educational system has been hobbled and purposely dumbed-down) in a system of property rights, contract law, and the moral values of individualism, could easily and handily throw off tyrants and still retain the knowledge and understanding of how to reconstituted a system based on those principles of property rights, contract law and the common law (Natural Law) tenets of individual rights.

A skilled common law judge would try to make all his decisions logically consistent with the two fundamental laws. Common law was not only a private legal system, it was a scientific one. Abraham Lincoln considered `Euclid's Geometry' to be one of his most important law books; he studied it to be sure the logic of his cases was airtight.
 One of the most important characteristics of common law was its certainty. It had evolved very carefully over many centuries, changing little from one decade to the next. The two fundamental laws remained always in place, a stabilizing force. The community could expect their legal environment to remain reasonably orderly. Richard Maybury]

    It has been shown repeatedly armed citizens reduce causalities or prevent mass shootings.

    The question for the American people, and not the usurped Federal or State Governments, is one of third party trust. Can American's expect their governments to protect them? Can American's in light of all of human history, expect their governments to not become immoral, corrupt or tyrannical?  Do Americans feel safe, even as their governments invite mostly fighting age males from Eastern nations having no moral or philosophical training or upbringing in the ways of a Limited Republic or a religiously unconcerned system of control based on common law, including property rights and individual rights? Do American's feel safer disarmed as their own country is being overrun by criminals, former terrorists, rapists and people with other undesirable characteristics, a people that are not going to assimilate and become Western, but are rather going to struggle non-stop to make America more Eastern.

    Will Americans feel safer disarmed as a financial collapse of proportions never experienced in America, deliberately caused by the financial looting of a criminal banking system and the vitiated corporate monopolies they licensed, creates armies of hungry, homeless and outraged people forced to take to the streets looking for answers and shelter from the banker's caused financial nuclear winter?
    The Government, their corporate masters and the criminal banking families behind them all are desperate to be sure Americans do not throw off their intended tyranny and restore a Natural Law system of government and reinvigorate the moral justice system that was once America and finally come after those who have attempted, with extreme hubris, to collapse civilization and rebirth it into a deformed, mentally ill, fledging New World Tyranny.

    MY CONCLUSION: Hold On To Your Guns Like Your Life Depends On Them.